Update 'How fast are really the analytical DBMS?'
parent
6e5354f95e
commit
4e3a7415aa
|
@ -14,11 +14,15 @@ Here are the results for postgresql
|
|||
|
||||
![Postgresql timings](https://git.guillemborrell.es/guillem/blog/raw/branch/main/images/analyticdbms/Screenshot_20230212_213038_Chrome.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
Here are the results for duckdb
|
||||
Here the results for Spark. For some reason Spark insisted in creating more than 200 partitions 🤷.
|
||||
|
||||
![Spark timings](https://git.guillemborrell.es/guillem/blog/raw/branch/main/images/analyticdbms/Screenshot_20230214_192902_Chrome.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
Here the results for duckdb
|
||||
|
||||
![Duckdb timings](https://git.guillemborrell.es/guillem/blog/raw/branch/main/images/analyticdbms/duckdb.jpg/Screenshot_20230212_175900_Chrome.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
And here are the results cor clickhouse
|
||||
And finally clickhouse
|
||||
|
||||
![Clickhouse timings](https://git.guillemborrell.es/guillem/blog/raw/branch/main/images/analyticdbms/Screenshot_20230212_180415_Chrome.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue