From 4e3a7415aa88e6ac440dec6b9407b39bdf3c585b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Borrell Nogueras Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 09:06:56 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update 'How fast are really the analytical DBMS?' --- How-fast-are-really-the-analytical-DBMS%3F.md | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/How-fast-are-really-the-analytical-DBMS%3F.md b/How-fast-are-really-the-analytical-DBMS%3F.md index 107bf5e..dc8e2f2 100644 --- a/How-fast-are-really-the-analytical-DBMS%3F.md +++ b/How-fast-are-really-the-analytical-DBMS%3F.md @@ -14,11 +14,15 @@ Here are the results for postgresql ![Postgresql timings](https://git.guillemborrell.es/guillem/blog/raw/branch/main/images/analyticdbms/Screenshot_20230212_213038_Chrome.jpg) -Here are the results for duckdb +Here the results for Spark. For some reason Spark insisted in creating more than 200 partitions 🤷. + +![Spark timings](https://git.guillemborrell.es/guillem/blog/raw/branch/main/images/analyticdbms/Screenshot_20230214_192902_Chrome.jpg) + +Here the results for duckdb ![Duckdb timings](https://git.guillemborrell.es/guillem/blog/raw/branch/main/images/analyticdbms/duckdb.jpg/Screenshot_20230212_175900_Chrome.jpg) -And here are the results cor clickhouse +And finally clickhouse ![Clickhouse timings](https://git.guillemborrell.es/guillem/blog/raw/branch/main/images/analyticdbms/Screenshot_20230212_180415_Chrome.jpg)